European Space Agency (ESA) feedback for EU Chips Act 2.0 Microchips technology for SPACE applications is crucial for Europes wellbeing and safety. Chips and PCBs (without printed circuit board chips would be useless) suitable for the harsh space environment are indispensable for European spacecraft for Earth Observation, Telecommunications, Navigation, Science, Exploration and Security.
ESA
European Space Agency
Other · Netherlands
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at European Space Agency? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
European Space Agency filed 2 positions between 24 Sept 2025 and 20 Nov 2025, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
Im part of the European Space Agency and have expertise in the development of Earth Observation-based applications, especially in the field of greenhouse gases and air quality monitoring. We recommend taking into consideration the inclusion of satellite remote sensing technologies as a potential data source for Monitoring, Reporting, Verification, for the prevention of circumvention and/or for enforcement purposes…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put European Space Agency next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 6.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from European Space Agency’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.