Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
EPF

European Property Federation

Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 36120303854-92not in register snapshot

This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 14 Sept 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.

2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at European Property Federation? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files European Property Federation engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from European Property Federation or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

European Property Federation filed 2 positions between 21 Sept 2020 and 22 Mar 2021, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here.

2020 · 1 filed2021 · 1 filed

What they argued

Renewable Energy Directivefiled 21 Sept 2020source

The main focus should be at energy system and CO2 emission level. For instance, in Finland the share of CO2-neutral energy production (electricity, district heating and district cooling) is rather high and therefore in buildings, as elsewhere, CO2-neutral energy is already commonly used.

Energy performance of buildingsfiled 22 Mar 2021source

On 20 January 2021, European Historic Houses (EHH), European Landowners' Organization (ELO), European Property Federation (EPF) and The European Group of Valuers' Associations (TEGOVA) sent a joint letter to Commissioner Simson. It addresses many of the key issues raised by the Inception Impact Assessment. Synopsis of the most important points: 1.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put European Property Federation next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 102.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from European Property Federation’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.