The attached paper contains EPF's response to the Passenger Mobility Package, focusing on the Passenger Rights proposals. Multimodal passenger rights: welcome as a first step in the right direction, but better protection needed for combined multimodal tickets. Enforcement: some improvements, but no game-changing new provisions.
European Passengers' Federation
Consumer organization · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 532739823521-44
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #73 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Rail Forum Europe (RFE): https://www.rail-forum.eu/
- CER Customer Liaison Group: https://www.cer.be/about-us/how-we-work
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Head office
- Brussel, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at European Passengers' Federation? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
European Passengers' Federation filed 8 positions between 17 Jan 2022 and 31 Jul 2026, across 6 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 7 times.
What they argued
The European Passengers’ Federation, representing 39 organisations from 21 countries, welcomes the EC’s initiative to review the passenger rights regulatory framework. In EPF’s perspective, the initiative needs to address a number of important issues: how to better protect passengers in a multimodal context; harmonizing and enforcing existing rules; extending current protection taking into account lessons learned…
For the European Passengers' Federation (EPF), the revision of the Air Services Regulation should address the following priority topics: 1. Price transparency. To safeguard and enhance price competition and price transparency, specific provisions are needed with regard to ancillary services.
EPF strongly welcomes the proposal to strengthen passenger protection for multi-operator rail journeys. A key improvement is that full passenger rights reimbursement, re-routing, assistance, and compensation would apply to all journeys sold as a single ticket, provided minimum connection times are respected.
The willingness of (potential) passengers to travel by rail is compromised by fears that, in the event of disruption, they may not be able to get to their final destination at the earliest available opportunity without paying additional charges. This seriously undermines passengers trust.
EPF welcomes the European Commissions review of VAT rules for passenger transport, stressing that current provisions are complex and unfairly favour high-emission modes like aviation due to zero-rating, while making rail less competitive. Despite strong public concern for the environment, cost remains a key barrier to sustainable travel choices.
EPF strongly supports the objective of enabling passengers to find, compare, combine and purchase rail tickets through the channel of their choice. The proposal pursues this through two complementary approaches: requiring railway operators to provide ticketing content including discounts , and real-time data to online ticketing providers; and obliging dominant vertically integrated rail platforms to display and sell…
The European Passengers' Federation (EPF) strongly supports ERA's work, whose mission is "Moving Europe towards a sustainable and safe railway system without frontiers". Since its establishment in 2004, ERA has made significant progress in strengthening rail safety and interoperability across the EU, and its technical achievements are widely recognised.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- IATA · 4 files in common
- IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it · 3 files in common
- CONFEBUS - CONFEDERACIÓN ESPAÑOLA DE TRANSPORTE EN AUTOBÚS · 3 files in common
- Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband (vzbv) · 3 files in common
- Groupe RATP · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 42.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from European Passengers' Federation’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.