ECCA hereby provides his comments to the draft Commission Regulation on the labelling of Plant Protection Products, repealing Regulation 547/2011. While ECCA welcomes this proposal, it contains some elements that raise serious concerns. ECCA comments are in the attached document.
ECC
ECCA
Industry association · Portugal · EU Transparency Register 059443622722-41
2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #1048 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1.8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€100K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
2
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2016
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Members of ECCA are associate to national crop protection associations in selected Member States.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- European Crop Care Association (ECCA)
- Head office
- Watermael-Boitsfort, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track ECCA in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at ECCA? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
ECCA filed 2 positions between 13 Feb 2020 and 31 Jan 2025, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2020 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed
What they argued
ECCA's complete comments are provided in the attached document. ECCA's comments are summarised as follows: 1. the legal basis for the proposed Regulation is questionable, since it combines amendments that require a different Comitology process 2. the manner of selecting substances for listing in Annex III is questioned.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put ECCA next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from ECCA’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.