There is a lack of data on implementation of socially responsible public procurement (SRPP) which is a barrier in assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of existing measures in addressing impacts on society of the goods, services, and works purchased, such as promoting employment opportunities, decent work, social inclusion, accessibility, and compliance with social and labour rights.
DIH
Danish Institute for Human Rights
Other · Denmark · EU Transparency Register 257612138504-68
4
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 326 tracked
4
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 145 other organisations on this site, they rank #25 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
3
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
—
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2020
in the register since
Declares membership of
- DIHR is a member of the European Network of National Human Rights Institutions (ENNHRI) which is a regional network o…
- http://ennhri.org
- DIHR is a participant in UN Global Compact since 2003.
- https://unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/participants/2758
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Other organisations
- Head office
- Copenhagen, Denmark
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Danish in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Danish Institute for Human Rights? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Danish Institute for Human Rights filed 4 positions between 4 Mar 2025 and 24 Jul 2026, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
2025 · 1 filed2026 · 3 filed
What they argued
The Danish Institute for Human Rights welcomes the revision of the public procurement directives. The Institute recommends that any revision ensures: 1. Alignment with international responsible business conduct standards 2. A coherent approach to responsible business conduct in the EU 3. An integrated approach to human rights and environmental objectives in public procurement in the EU 4.
The DIHR welcomes the amendment of the SFDR as an opportunity to consolidate the human rights/social sustainability dimension of this regulation. The DIHR's recommendations for the SFDR review (see briefing attached) seek to facilitate policy coherence with related EU sustainable finance and corporate sustainability instruments as well as coherence with international standards on responsible business conduct…
The Danish Institute for Human Rights acknowledges the European Commission (EC)'s initiative to establish a European Critical Raw Materials Centre (the Centre). The Centre can play an important role in improving coordination and resilience in the EU on critical raw material (CRM).
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Cefic · 3 files in common
- Eurelectric · 3 files in common
- Recycling Europe · 3 files in common
- Zentralverband des Deutschen Handwerks (ZDH) · 3 files in common
- ENTSO-E (European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity) · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 144.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Danish Institute for Human Rights’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.