The Danish Institute for Human Rights (the Institute) welcomes the opportunity to respond to this call for evidence on the digital package on simplification launched by the European Commission. The Institute is Denmark´s national human rights institution with a legal mandate to monitor and promote the implementation of human rights, including fundamental rights, in Denmark and abroad.
Danish Institute for Human Rights
Public authority · Denmark · EU Transparency Register 257612138504-68
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 171 other organisations on this site, they rank #19 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- DIHR is a member of the European Network of National Human Rights Institutions (ENNHRI) which is a regional network o…
- http://ennhri.org
- DIHR is a participant in UN Global Compact since 2003.
- https://unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/participants/2758
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Other organisations
- Head office
- Copenhagen, Denmark
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Danish in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Danish Institute for Human Rights? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Danish Institute for Human Rights filed 10 positions between 8 Oct 2020 and 24 Jul 2026, across 9 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 10 times.
What they argued
The Danish Institute for Human Rights welcomes the revision of the public procurement directives. The Institute recommends that any revision ensures: 1. Alignment with international responsible business conduct standards 2. A coherent approach to responsible business conduct in the EU 3. An integrated approach to human rights and environmental objectives in public procurement in the EU 4.
There is a lack of data on implementation of socially responsible public procurement (SRPP) which is a barrier in assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of existing measures in addressing impacts on society of the goods, services, and works purchased, such as promoting employment opportunities, decent work, social inclusion, accessibility, and compliance with social and labour rights.
The Danish Institute for Human Rights (the Institute) welcomes that the EU identifies adverse social and environmental impacts as one of the six key problems in the supply of critical raw materials. Indeed, the production of critical and processing of raw materials can have significant adverse impacts on the human rights of workers and communities.
The Danish Institute for Human Rights (the Institute) welcomes that the Commissions draft revised European Sustainability Reporting Standards (the draft) generally aligns with EFRAGs draft on several key aspects. It positively upholds the double materiality principle, which is key as it enables companies to report their sustainability impacts, financial risks and opportunities in an integrated manner.
The Danish Institute for Human Rights is grateful for the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. To ensure that recovery after COVID-19 is just and equitable, that human rights abuses connected to unsustainable business practices are tackled and that the urgent issues of climate change and environmental degradation are adequately addressed, there is a need…
The Danish Institute for Human Rights (DIHR) is an independent National Human Rights Institution established by the Danish Parliament in accordance with the UN Paris Principles and is accredited with A status. Under its legal mandate, the DIHR's main functions are to monitor human rights in Denmark and promote human rights internationally, including through engagement with non-state actors.
The DIHR welcomes the amendment of the SFDR as an opportunity to consolidate the human rights/social sustainability dimension of this regulation. The DIHR's recommendations for the SFDR review (see briefing attached) seek to facilitate policy coherence with related EU sustainable finance and corporate sustainability instruments as well as coherence with international standards on responsible business conduct…
JULY 2021 FEEDBACK TO THE CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING ADOPTED ACT INTRODUCTION The Danish Institute for Human Rights (DIHR) welcomes the recognition by the European Commission of the vital role that non-financial reporting plays in encouraging responsible business conduct and efforts to reform the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) to address the existing gap between the sustainability information…
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
The Danish Institute for Human Rights acknowledges the European Commission (EC)'s initiative to establish a European Critical Raw Materials Centre (the Centre). The Centre can play an important role in improving coordination and resilience in the EU on critical raw material (CRM).
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Danish Institute for Human Rights next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 467.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Danish Institute for Human Rights’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.