The Danish Forest Association supports the high ambition for the climate in the fit for 55 package set to combat the climate change, including the suggestion to increase the share of renewable energy in the energy mix.
Danish Forest Association
NGO · Denmark
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Danish in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Danish Forest Association? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Danish Forest Association filed 3 positions between 26 Nov 2020 and 7 Feb 2024, across 3 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
The Danish Forest Associations feedback on the European Commission Inception Impact Assessment: Amendment of the Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry Regulation The need to amend the LULUCF Regulation is based on the fact that the European forests has to sequester and store more carbon and keep on doing it in the future. Only managed forest can rise to that challenge.
Nordic countries have a long history of collecting forest information. For more than 100 years Nordic countries have been collecting forest data that has strategically guided and helped optimize our forest management at local and national level. The Alliance of Nordic Family Forestry (NSF), which Danish Forest Association is a member of has developed jointly this feedback.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Danish Forest Association next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 67.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Danish Forest Association’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.