The current investment prioritization strategy adopts a top-down approach, which primarily benefits large Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) across various industrial sectors. While this model aligns well with research infrastructures, it is less suited to technology infrastructures (TIs), which are intended to be shared broadly across the industrial ecosystem.
CETIM
Academic / research · France
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track CETIM in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at CETIM? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
CETIM filed 2 positions between 16 May 2025 and 21 May 2025, across 1 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
The approach proposed by prioritising investments is a top-down one. This will be of benefit for large OEMs in different industrial sectors. This approach fits more to research infrastructures than technology infrastructures that should be shared with industry. But to answer to the TI needs of the whole supply chain manufacturing companies (SME) of these industrial sectors, we also need a bottom-up approach.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from CETIM’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.