This and the previous call for evidence suggest that the amendment was technical and limited in scope. Manufacturers and users of other instruments are made to mistakenly believe that they were not affected. For instance, the absence of feedback should not be read as restaurants accept the ban on drinking glasses, fundamentally changing the centuries-old and well-accepted modalities of their business.
AFR
Agentur für Messwertqualität und Innovation e.V.
Consumer organization · Germany
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
3
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Agentur in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Agentur für Messwertqualität und Innovation e.V.? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Agentur für Messwertqualität und Innovation e.V. filed 3 positions between 17 Oct 2024 and 7 Oct 2025, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2024 · 1 filed2025 · 2 filed
What they argued
The proposal is sure to have substantial and unintended, very harmful side effects. It will adversely affect European manufacturers, users of measuring instruments and consumers. It will further slow down the roll out of smart grids and EV charging infrastructure, and reduce consumer protection, thereby harming the "fit for 55" goals. It must not be implemented without impact assessment and cost benefit analysis.
We thank you for the opportunity to comment on the MID and the NAWID. In our opinion, coherence is crucial. We think there should be only one EU directive on metrology to strengthen the coherence. The MID and the NAWID should be combined. Consequently, we submit the same comment both in the MID and in the NAWID call for evidence.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Agentur für Messwertqualität und Innovation e.V. next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 10.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Agentur für Messwertqualität und Innovation e.V.’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.