Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
ZFR

Zentrum für Risiko- und Krisenmanagement (ZRK)

Academic / research · Austria

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Zentrum in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Zentrum für Risiko- und Krisenmanagement (ZRK)? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Zentrum für Risiko- und Krisenmanagement (ZRK) engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Zentrum für Risiko- und Krisenmanagement (ZRK) or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Zentrum für Risiko- und Krisenmanagement (ZRK) filed 2 positions between 19 Jun 2025 and 4 Jul 2025, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

What they argued

Digital Networks Actfiled 4 Jul 2025source

We welcome the efforts to simplify telecoms rules, but such consolidation should be strictly based on facts and technology neutrality, in line with the principle of proportionality in national regulation. Furthermore, we believe that the Commission’s interest in extending the scope and objectives of the current legal framework needs to be carefully balanced against gold-plating.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Amending the NIS 2 Directive as regards simplification measures and alignment with the Cybersecurity Act 2filed 19 Jun 2025PDFsource

The CRC in Vienna welcomes any initiative to strengthen cybersecurity resilience, but warns against putting geopolitical factors on the same level or above the relevant technical standards. As regards the strengthening of ENISA, we take the view that resources should be strengthened for the existing areas of activity instead of expanding the Agency’s competence.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 69.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Zentrum für Risiko- und Krisenmanagement (ZRK)’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.