not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
3
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
We see the need to protect environmental compartments and preserve areas/habitats of high nature value. On the other hand, such efforts must be seen not only in the context of environmental aspects, but in the context of the EU’s socio-economic dimension as a whole. In our view, this proposal ignores this context. The economic impact assessment is trivialised and not carried out in detail.
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
Agriculture is a field that has been very closely linked for centuries to landscape formation and maintenance, including the development of diverse habitats and various management methods, which have contributed to and contribute to a rich biodevirus agricultural landscape. There is no doubt that this social benefit will continue to be provided by agriculture in the future.
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
We see that trade chains require producers to make specific supplies in packaging from a specific packaging supplier (a specific company). Packaging from another supplier is considered as one-off although it meets all requirements (except for the supplier’s company name). Packaging suppliers then increase prices by different charges.
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Zemědělský svaz ČR next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Zemědělský svaz ČR’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.