World Animal Protection Sweden welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the European Commissions Call for Evidence on the Biotech Act II. We advocate for a transition away from industrial animal agriculture systems characterised by high-intensity and high-density production towards equitable, humane, sustainable and resilient protein systems, where animal welfare, environmental sustainability and food security are…
WAP
World Animal Protection
NGO · Sweden · EU Transparency Register 929331127035-69
4
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 665 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #375 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1.9
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
4
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2017
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Eurogroup for Animals https://www.eurogroupforanimals.org/
- The European Alliance for Plant-based Foods (EAPF) https://plantbasedfoodalliance.eu/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Head office
- London, United kingdom
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track World in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at World Animal Protection? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
World Animal Protection filed 4 positions between 14 Jul 2021 and 9 Jun 2026, across 4 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2021 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed2026 · 2 filed
What they argued
World Animal Protection welcomes the EU initiative aiming at further embedding sustainability into corporate governance, which would amend the reporting requirements of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). In that context, we strongly believes that the concept of non-financial reporting currently developed at the EU level should encompass animal welfare.
We support the scenario outlined in the second option; A ban after a transition period of fur farming in EU and a ban for placing fur products on the EU market. There is strong and growing public concern regarding the cruelty and ethical issues related to keeping and killing animals solely for fur production.
World Animal Protection Sweden welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the European Commissions Call for Evidence on the midterm evaluation of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) 20232027. Evidence from Sweden: Design and Performance of Animal Welfare Payment: Sweden has long applied CAP animal welfare payments exclusively to practices that exceed baseline legal requirements.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put World Animal Protection next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 17.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from World Animal Protection’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.