WISE and Greenpeace Netherlands are happy with the fact that the Commission is reviewing the delegated act under the Taxonomy Regulation, however is more than baffled by the tone of the call for evidence. It is clear that the Commission has only listened to the nuclear industry and the pro-nuclear alliance among the Member States, when formulating this call.
WNA
WISE Netherlands - also representing Greenpeace Netherlands
NGO · Netherlands · EU Transparency Register 923687245367-68
2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #710 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
2.3
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2022
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Nuclear Transparency Watch - http://www.nuclear-transparency-watch.eu/
- Climate Action Network Europe - CANEurope - https://caneurope.org/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Registered as
- World Information Service on Energy (WISE)
- Head office
- Utrecht, Netherlands
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track WISE in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at WISE Netherlands - also representing Greenpeace Netherlands? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
WISE Netherlands - also representing Greenpeace Netherlands filed 2 positions between 8 Jul 2025 and 25 Nov 2025, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
WISE supports the extension of the scope of ETS1 in line with the polluter pays principle. We support the lowering of the threshold for the rated thermal power of energy production units, the inclusion of municipal waste incineration and other waste management processes in the ETS, and further emissions from the maritime sector and by including emissions from international aviation.
Filed in Dutch · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put WISE Netherlands - also representing Greenpeace Netherlands next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 58.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from WISE Netherlands - also representing Greenpeace Netherlands’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.