Please refer to the attached files. It describes in more detail our suggestion on how to improve the recommendation: 1. Clearly state the need to recognize and remunerate the activities performed by ISP, de facto to protect the business of content providers/right holders from piracy activities; 2.
WP
WindTreS.p.A.
Company · Italy
2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track WindTreS.p.A. in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at WindTreS.p.A.? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
WindTreS.p.A. filed 2 positions between 3 Jun 2025 and 2 Oct 2025, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
TEXT NOT ACCESSIBLE – CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL. Modernisation of investigations: R: OK access to data, including online data in the cloud, but in some way ensuring the presence/supervision of the company for the protection of information, so that compliance with the scope of the procedure to which reference is made is also checked by the company.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put WindTreS.p.A. next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from WindTreS.p.A.’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.