From a risk management point of view it is important that EUBWs are taken in use without delay - especially in the public sector. And that the applications are capable of mitigating quantum risks. Industry and trade need the global approach in any case: https://www.finextra.com/blogposting/30114/will-eu-be-an-isolated-island
Why-Advisory Oy
Company · Finland
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Why-Advisory in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Why-Advisory Oy? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Why-Advisory Oy filed 4 positions between 18 Nov 2025 and 12 Mar 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
European Business Wallets should now be seen as the New E x e c u t i o n Layer of the Single Market and therefore be taken in use by all public sector units in all member states without delay. Reasons for urgency: 1. The unique opportunity to advance the Single Market and radically improve productivity and security in all sectors. 2. The Single Market's geopolitical importance. 3.
Good morning, I have now read your eminent EBW-outcome, discussed it with ao WeBuild activists and published comments in social media and Finextra. I have been nagging about this approach for over 5 years - so you can imagine my joy when reading it. Most are very exited about the clear vision of fully digital and automated interactions with customers, suppliers, partner networks and public sector units.
A crystallisation of the steps is needed: 1. The base for progress in all areas is the Trust Infrastructure. Getting the EBWs from the markets and with them the general-purpose EUDIWs and AI-agents in test use before dead lines. 2. To motivate fast wallet deployment and frequent use there must be a critical mass of verifiable data exchange available. Especially to and from EBWs in enterprises. 3.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- DIGITALEUROPE · 3 files in common
- Bitkom e.V. · 3 files in common
- IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it · 2 files in common
- BDI - Federation of German Industries · 2 files in common
- MEDEF · 2 files in common
Showing 5 of 21.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Why-Advisory Oy’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.