identity not settledMore than one register entry could match this filer, so we have not linked it to any of them. The filings shown are those under this exact name.
3
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 639 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Work at WEEE AUDITS? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
WEEE AUDITS filed 3 positions between 22 Dec 2021 and 17 Jun 2022, across 3 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
WEEE AUDITS Ref. Ares(2022)4469588 - 17/06/2022 Dokument: Dokument ID: Datum: PM – Comments on the EcoDesign Regulation WA-332-2022 2022-06-17 PM – Comments on the EcoDesign Regulation Author: Lennart Ask WEEE AUDITS welcomes the EcoDesign regulation but want to highlight some incorrect use of terminology, primarily related to the Waste Framework Directive.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
WEEE AUDITS welcomes a revision of the Waste Shipment Regulation and want to address the following topics: - The preferable recovery operation according to the waste hierarchy, defined in article 4 in the WFD – Preparing for re-use. - The alignment with the Waste Framework Directive (WFD) - Terminology issues, and - Producer´s responsibility that are described in the added file.
WEEE did not support the audit of Annex IV since non the three general objectives that is provided to justify the audit is met. On the reverse WEEE submitted to it an incentive in greenhouse gas emissions and reduced recycling. With no change in the quality in recycled materials.
Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put WEEE AUDITS next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from WEEE AUDITS’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.