Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
WSL

WE Soda Ltd

Company · United Kingdom · EU Transparency Register 278896799421-73not in register snapshot

This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 14 Oct 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.

6
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
5
legislative files
of 665 tracked
5
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track WE in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow WE Soda Ltd

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at WE Soda Ltd? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

WE Soda Ltd filed 6 positions between 8 Jul 2025 and 8 Jun 2026, across 5 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.

2025 · 4 filed2026 · 2 filed

What they argued

EU Emissions Trading System and market stability reserve: competitiveness and cost-effective decarbonisationfiled 8 Jul 2025PDFsource

WE Soda, the largest producer of soda ash in the world, urges the EU to revise its EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) to genuinely support the decarbonization of the glass value chain in Europe while strengthening industrial innovation. The current EU ETS design disadvantages low-carbon soda ash compared to higher-carbon soda ash made in the EU. This is for two fundamental reasons: 1.

Objection to ETS Benchmark Values Regulation 2026–2030filed 8 Jun 2026PDFsource

This submission addresses a structural flaw in the EU Emissions Trading System that creates a concrete risk of double allocation within the synthetic soda ash/glass value chain. This risk, if left unaddressed, would undermine the environmental integrity of the system and distort competition across the value chain.

Carbon price paid in a third country under the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM)filed 29 May 2026PDFsource

WE Soda welcomes the European Commissions draft implementing act specifying how a carbon price already paid in a third country can be deducted from the CBAM obligation. We particularly welcome the establishment of a transparent conversion methodology, detailed evidence requirements, and clear qualification and independence rules for third-party certifiers.

Carbon price paid in a third country under the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM)filed 24 Sept 2025PDFsource

Executive summary: WE Soda strongly supports the creation of a clear, consistent, and legally certain framework for the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) that allows for the deduction of carbon prices paid in third countries. We urge the EU Commission to establish specific rules for converting a carbon price paid in a third country, such as Türkiye, into a corresponding number of CBAM certificates.

Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3) of the Rules of Procedure on the draft Commission Implementing Regulation laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and the Council as regards the methods for the calculation of emissions embedded in goodsfiled 24 Sept 2025PDFsource

WE Soda urges the EU Commission to expand the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to include the soda ash and glass industries in line with the EU policy objectives. We call for an integrated assessment and design of CBAM benchmarks to ensure low-carbon soda ash is treated fairly.

Adjustment of the obligation to surrender CBAM certificates to take account of ETS free allowances phase-outfiled 24 Sept 2025source

Executive summary: WE Soda urges the EU Commission to expand the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to include the soda ash and glass industries in line with the EU policy objectives. WE Sodal also calls for an integrated assessment and design of CBAM benchmarks to ensure that low-carbon soda ash has a level playing field with high-carbon soda ash produced in Europe.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put WE Soda Ltd next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 161.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from WE Soda Ltd’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.