This submission addresses a structural flaw in the EU Emissions Trading System that creates a concrete risk of double allocation within the synthetic soda ash/glass value chain. This risk, if left unaddressed, would undermine the environmental integrity of the system and distort competition across the value chain.
WE Soda Ltd
Company · United Kingdom · EU Transparency Register 278896799421-73not in register snapshot
This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 30 Aug 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track WE in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at WE Soda Ltd? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
WE Soda Ltd filed 5 positions between 24 Sept 2025 and 8 Jun 2026, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
What they argued
WE Soda welcomes the European Commissions draft implementing act specifying how a carbon price already paid in a third country can be deducted from the CBAM obligation. We particularly welcome the establishment of a transparent conversion methodology, detailed evidence requirements, and clear qualification and independence rules for third-party certifiers.
Executive summary: WE Soda strongly supports the creation of a clear, consistent, and legally certain framework for the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) that allows for the deduction of carbon prices paid in third countries. We urge the EU Commission to establish specific rules for converting a carbon price paid in a third country, such as Türkiye, into a corresponding number of CBAM certificates.
WE Soda urges the EU Commission to expand the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to include the soda ash and glass industries in line with the EU policy objectives. We call for an integrated assessment and design of CBAM benchmarks to ensure low-carbon soda ash is treated fairly.
Executive summary: WE Soda urges the EU Commission to expand the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to include the soda ash and glass industries in line with the EU policy objectives. WE Sodal also calls for an integrated assessment and design of CBAM benchmarks to ensure that low-carbon soda ash has a level playing field with high-carbon soda ash produced in Europe.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Cefic · 4 files in common
- ECOS · 4 files in common
- Bellona Europa · 4 files in common
- Norsk Hydro · 4 files in common
- UNESID · 4 files in common
Showing 5 of 112.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from WE Soda Ltd’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.