Revision of the WFD is a chance to move up the waste hierarchy toward prevention and reuse, supporting the development of reuse infrastructure while still embracing the polluter pays principal. * We call for a per capita residual waste target of 100kg or less to encourage waste reduction and quality material recycling/composting.
VOI
VOICE
Environmental organization · Ireland · EU Transparency Register 891905204not in register snapshot
identity not settledMore than one register entry could match this filer, so we have not linked it to any of them. The filings shown are those under this exact name.
This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 14 Sept 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.
2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track VOICE in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at VOICE? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
VOICE filed 2 positions between 22 Feb 2022 and 17 Mar 2026, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
2022 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
The evaluation of the SingleUse Plastics Directive (SUPD) should focus on reinforcingrather than weakeningthe Directives environmental objectives and its central role in preventing pollution. The SUPD has already delivered tangible benefits, particularly through targeted product bans and design requirements such as tethered caps, which have proven practical, visible, and effective in reducing litter at source.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put VOICE next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 41.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from VOICE’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.