Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
UPL

University of Pisa - LAB MAPPA

Academic / research · Italy · EU Transparency Register 942166532856-62

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 44 academic institutions on this site, they rank #24 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

1.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2018
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • among the others:
  • https://tour4eu.eu/
  • https://sciencebusiness.net/
  • http://www.uni-med.net/
  • https://www.eera-set.eu/
  • https://etp-nanomedicine.eu/
  • https://biconsortium.eu/
  • https://ipiff.org/
  • https://www.aspire2050.eu/
  • https://snetp.eu/

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Academic institutions
Registered as
Università di Pisa (UNIPI)
Head office
Pisa, Italy

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track University in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at University of Pisa - LAB MAPPA? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files University of Pisa - LAB MAPPA engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from University of Pisa - LAB MAPPA or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

University of Pisa - LAB MAPPA filed 2 positions between 8 Mar 2026 and 26 Aug 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

What they argued

Revision of EU rules to protect the marine environmentfiled 8 Mar 2026PDFsource

The revision of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) represents a crucial opportunity to strengthen the EUs capacity to address emerging pressures that significantly affect marine ecosystems but remain insufficiently recognised in current regulatory frameworks.

AI strategy for cultural and creative sectorsfiled 26 Aug 2026source

I believe that cultural heritage (CH) should be seen not just as a sector that benefits from AI or provides valuable training data, but also as a domain of scientific knowledge with its own ways of working and specific needs. The Call for Evidence highlights the importance of fair access to high-quality data and points to the common European data space for CH as a key resource for AI training.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from University of Pisa - LAB MAPPA’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.