Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
UU

Universiteit Utrecht

Academic / research · Netherlands

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Universiteit in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Universiteit Utrecht? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Universiteit Utrecht engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Universiteit Utrecht or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Universiteit Utrecht filed 2 positions between 5 Mar 2025 and 22 Jan 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Evaluation of the Public Procurement Directivesfiled 5 Mar 2025PDFsource

Proposals from our Legal Affairs Unit: 1. Under the eligibility requirements and the grounds for exclusion, give all candidates/tenderers the possibility of incorrect repair once, including missing documents and new reference projects. 2. Changes to the Information Note do not require the publication of a corrigendum (unless the nature of the contract changes). 3.

Filed in Dutch · English published by the European Commission

Revision of EU rules on public procurementfiled 22 Jan 2026PDFsource

Proposals from our Legal Affairs Unit (with brief explanation in the attached document): 1. Under the eligibility requirements and the grounds for exclusion, give all candidates/tenderers the possibility of incorrect repair once, including missing documents and new reference projects. 2. Changes to the Information Note do not require the publication of a corrigendum (unless the nature of the contract changes). 3.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 128.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Universiteit Utrecht’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.