Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
UCJ

United for Climate Justice

Environmental organization · Netherlands · EU Transparency Register 811911695170-13

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #418 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.3
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2024
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • UCJ is not a member of any organisations
  • associations
  • (con)federations
  • networks and other bodies.
  • Climate Action Network Europe provided funding in the form of a microgrant (4000 euros) to UCJ in April 2024 and it w…
  • In November of 2025, UCJ received a microgrant under the Funding Fairer Futures Program under the DEAR Programme mana…

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
Bruxelles, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track United in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at United for Climate Justice? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files United for Climate Justice engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from United for Climate Justice or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

United for Climate Justice filed 2 positions between 16 Feb 2026 and 27 Mar 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

What they argued

Guidance on the application of the ‘do no significant harm’ principle under the 2028-2034 MFFfiled 27 Mar 2026PDFsource

Fossil fuel subsidies are fundamentally incompatible with the DNSH principle, as they perpetuate environmental harm, distort markets, and contradict the EUs commitment to climate neutrality by 2050. The 8th Environmental Action Programme and, more recently, the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice (2025) both underscore the need to phase out fossil fuel subsidies without delay.

Update of the governance of the Energy Union and climate actionfiled 16 Feb 2026PDFsource

Fossil fuel subsidy phase-out should be at the center of the update of the Governance Regulation, which needs to anchor binding provisions on a harmonised definition of fossil fuel subsidies, mandatory transparent reporting, national and Union phase-out deadlines, and a robust monitoring and enforcement mechanism. More information in the attached file.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 12.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from United for Climate Justice’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.