Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
ULC

Union Luxembourgeoise des Consommateurs

Consumer organization · Luxembourg · EU Transparency Register 514868218412-91not in register snapshot

This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 14 Sept 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.

2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Union in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Union Luxembourgeoise des Consommateurs? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Union Luxembourgeoise des Consommateurs engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Union Luxembourgeoise des Consommateurs or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Union Luxembourgeoise des Consommateurs filed 2 positions between 29 Jun 2020 and 11 Aug 2020, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

What they argued

Digital Services Actfiled 29 Jun 2020PDFsource

ROADMAP DIGITAL SERVICES ACT – DEEPENING INTERNAL MARKET & CLARIFYING RESPONSIBILITIES FOR DIGITAL SERVICES COMMENTS In line with BEUC, we suggest that an updating and modernising of the e-Commerce Directive are needed but « if not carefully drafted, the DSA could be a barrier for Member States to protect consumers or correctly address public interest objectives » (BEUC).

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Consumer creditsfiled 11 Aug 2020PDFsource

Enclosed a fw comments based on expected we expressed already unsuccessfully to the Luxembourg legislator when the current Directive was up for implementation. The Roadmap identifies the main problem areas which we share. Our preferred action.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Union Luxembourgeoise des Consommateurs next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 6.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Union Luxembourgeoise des Consommateurs’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.