Industry association · France · EU Transparency Register 0233206100330-63
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 311 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #128 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Union in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Union des professionnels des plantes à parfum, aromatiques et médicinales (PPAM de France)? so we know who speaks for it.
Union des professionnels des plantes à parfum, aromatiques et médicinales (PPAM de France) filed 3 positions between 12 Apr 2022 and 2 Dec 2025, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
The Union of perfume, aromatic and medicinal plant professionals (PPAM of France) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the application of Article 29 of Regulation (EU) 2018/848 on the presence of non-authorised products and substances in organic products. PPAM DE FRANCE fully supports the objectives of the biological regulation.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
PPAM de France welcomes the European Commission’s initiative to make best use of EU agencies to streamline scientific assessments of chemical substances. In particular we strongly support the proposal to introduce new tools for the One Substance One Assessment (OSOA) approach, which would further improve the work of the Industry and Scientific Committees in ensuring consumer safety by: • extending the use of the…
PPAM de France welcomes the opportunity to comment on the proposal and support its core aim of establishing a self-standing legal framework and stronger governance for the Agency. Beside this, we want to comment on the essential role of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) and to stress the importance of ensuring that its valuable work continues effectively under the framework of the European Chemicals…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 20.
Everything on this page comes from Union des professionnels des plantes à parfum, aromatiques et médicinales (PPAM de France)’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.