Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
UUG

Umweltgutachterausschuss (UGA) / German EMAS Advisory Board

Other · Germany · EU Transparency Register 824317234787-49

1
position filed
in the 326 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 145 other organisations on this site, they rank #141 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€25K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2019
in the register since
Register category
Other organisations
Registered as
Geschäftsstelle des Umweltgutachterausschusses (UGA)
Head office
Berlin, Germany

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Umweltgutachterausschuss in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Umweltgutachterausschuss (UGA) / German EMAS Advisory Board? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the file Umweltgutachterausschuss (UGA) / German EMAS Advisory Board engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on this file, from Umweltgutachterausschuss (UGA) / German EMAS Advisory Board or from anyone else on it. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Umweltgutachterausschuss (UGA) / German EMAS Advisory Board filed 1 position on 24 Aug 2020, across 1 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

What they argued

Substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive)filed 24 Aug 2020PDFsource

The Committee of Environmental Verifiers (UGA) strongly supports the Commission’s efforts to present an ambitious strategy with concrete roadmaps for achieving the 2050 climate targets. However, the UGA rejects all the above options as it considers that EMAS already provides a reliable tool for the presentation and validation of environmental performance, in particular with regard to the OEF.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Umweltgutachterausschuss (UGA) / German EMAS Advisory Board’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.