Other · Germany · EU Transparency Register 824317234787-49
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 171 other organisations on this site, they rank #58 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track German in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at German EMAS Advisory Board? so we know who speaks for it.
German EMAS Advisory Board filed 4 positions between 3 Feb 2020 and 13 Jul 2021, across 4 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
The German EMAS Advisory Board welcomes the Commission’s call for feedback on the forthcoming draft of the Climate Law as well as its efforts to address climate change with the intention to reach climate neutrality by 2050.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The Committee of Environmental Verifiers (UGA) strongly supports the Commission’s efforts to present an ambitious strategy with concrete roadmaps for achieving the 2050 climate targets. However, the UGA rejects all the above options as it considers that EMAS already provides a reliable tool for the presentation and validation of environmental performance, in particular with regard to the OEF.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The German EMAS Advisory Board fully supports the statement of the Spanish Club EMAS. It argues that the initiative for the revision of the EED is a good way to achieve better energy efficiency performance in Europe, but calls for EMAS, the EU's eco-management and audit scheme, to be clearly and forcefully taken into account.
The UGA Board welcomes in principle the qualitative and quantitative improvement of the CSRD. In particular, it supports a meaningful review of the content of the reported information on sustainability issues. The draft Directive provides for the possibility of verifying this information also by auditors covered by the Accreditation Regulation (EC) No 765/2008. This option is strongly welcomed.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put German EMAS Advisory Board next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 160.
Everything on this page comes from German EMAS Advisory Board’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.