Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
UGI

Ugitech

Company · France

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Ugitech in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Ugitech? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Ugitech engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Ugitech or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Ugitech filed 2 positions on 25 Sept 2025, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.

What they argued

Carbon price paid in a third country under the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM)filed 25 Sept 2025source

The carbon price paid in the country of origin must have been certified by a third body listed by the European Commission in order to avoid allegations that are difficult to verify. If a producer pays carbon in its country of origin, it is imperative to declare actual resignations according to the CBAM methodology, certified by a third party body. It shall not be able to use default values.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

Carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) methodology for the definitive periodfiled 25 Sept 2025source

— The calculation of embedded emissions must be made in accordance with the ETS regulations, it must include all CO2 emissions associated with the manufacture of the product (steel), such as the combustion of natural gas and other fossil fuels. — The CO2 emissions for electricity must be determined with the off-take factor specific to the country of production (i.e.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 80.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Ugitech’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.