In general, it can be stated that when travel and transport are needed, the use of efficient, crossborder rail transport have a great potential to contribute to desirable reductions in the climate impact of transports and at the same time strengthen Europe's and thereby also Sweden's economy and competitiveness in the world. This also applies to intermodal transport involving rail.
Trafikverket
Public authority · Sweden · EU Transparency Register 202100-6297not in register snapshot
This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 14 Oct 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Trafikverket in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Trafikverket? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Trafikverket filed 4 positions between 5 Apr 2022 and 9 Jun 2025, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
What they argued
Trafikverket (The Swedish Transport Administration) believes that international travel and freight transport must be easily accessible at international level. It is the passenger or transport buyer who chooses the transport option. To make this possible, stakeholders in the rail industry must cooperate, coordinate and jointly strive to make the railway more accessible and attractive.
It is necessary to review the rules on the applicability of the emergency procedure set out in Article 16(12) of the EU Air Transport Regulation in order to ensure scheduled air services also in situations of sudden disruption of air services currently not covered by the emergency procedure.
Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission
The importance of a gap- and benefit analysis The draft text of the Telematics TSI does not only merge two regulations, but also extends the use of data exchanges and introduces new concepts. Trafikverket welcomes ERAs Advisory notes, but will still consider that the Advisory notes does not replace an impact assessment and it is worth noting that this merge and addition of regulation has not been examined by an…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Trafikverket next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 10.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Trafikverket’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.