Before addressing the individual objectives (in the file attached), I-Com deems it essential to highlight that the current EU digital regulatory framework is already very complex, articulated (and sometimes poorly harmonized), and largely still in its initial implementation phase (e.g., DSA and DMA, Data Act).
The Institute for Competitiveness | I-Com
NGO · Italy · EU Transparency Register 859942318143-66
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 126 think tanks and research institutions on this site, they rank #40 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- European Internet Forum (EIF): https://www.eifonline.org/members.html
- Global Trade and Innovation Policy Alliance (GTIPA): https://www.gtipa.org/
- PromethEUs: https://www.prometheusnetwork.eu/
- Gruppo Iniziativa Italiana (GII): https://gruppoiniziativaitaliana.eu/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Think tanks and research institutions
- Registered as
- Istituto per la Competitività (I-Com)
- Head office
- Roma, Italy
- EU office
- Bruxelles
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track The in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at The Institute for Competitiveness | I-Com? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
The Institute for Competitiveness | I-Com filed 3 positions between 28 Jun 2024 and 11 Jul 2025, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
What they argued
I-Com agrees on the necessity to streamline cybersecurity requirements and reporting obligations. The current European regulatory ecosystem appears as a vast constellation, imposing a significant volume of duties and obligations often on the same entities which must carry out numerous activities, sometimes with differing timelines and procedures, to achieve identical or very similar objectives.
I-Com agrees with the Commission's initiative, since an understanding of technological and market trends is a necessary precondition for assessing the appropriateness of any proposals for the adoption of legislation or moral suasion.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · 3 files in common
- DIGITALEUROPE · 3 files in common
- Bitkom e.V. · 3 files in common
- Danish Industry · 3 files in common
- Confederation of Swedish Enterprise · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 147.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from The Institute for Competitiveness | I-Com’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.