Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
TES

Tesla

Company · Netherlands · EU Transparency Register 547225616323-13

13
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
11
legislative files
of 665 tracked
5
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #109 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

5.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€800K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
5
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • www.solarpowereurope.org
  • www.smarten.eu
  • www.emobilityeurope.org
  • www.digitaleurope.org
  • www.eurometaux.eu
  • https://www.openchargealliance.org
  • https://evroaming.org/
  • https://fair-standards.org
  • https://www.chargeupeurope.eu/
  • https://ease-storage.eu/

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Companies & groups
Registered as
Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V. (Tesla)
Head office
Amsterdam Zuid Oost, Netherlands

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Tesla in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Tesla

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Tesla? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Tesla filed 13 positions between 8 Apr 2020 and 25 Aug 2026, across 11 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.

2020 · 4 filed2021 · 1 filed2023 · 1 filed2024 · 1 filed2025 · 5 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Negative trade-related effects of global overcapacity on the Union steel marketfiled 15 Dec 2025source

I believe that eventual regulatory measures to address excess global capacity into EU should be centered and progressive, not lobbied by EU mills to raise prices in a panicky environment. I think it would be correct to curb progressively the import "duty free" quotas (perhaps in 2 steps from the current 36 Miot, proposed to go to 18 Mio/t) and leaving the beyond quota duty at 25% (not 50%).

CO2 emission standards for cars and vansfiled 26 Nov 2020source

Recommendations for analysis: • Make a trend analysis of the annual rate of improvement required between 2019 and 2030 according to current legislation, including the impact of the ZLEV benchmark on required CO2 cuts and the inclusion of MAC improvements in eco-innovations; • On the basis of that analysis, investigate ways to accelerate the required rate of improvement in these years, including for the early years…

Trans-European energy infrastructure: guidelinesfiled 16 Jul 2025source

Dear Officials, thank you for giving us the opportunity to contribute to your Call for Evidence on the European Grid Package. The European Electricity Market Integration is a great European achievement. Electricity companies now benefit from access to a vast Internal Electricity Market, where electricity freely flows across borders, with expanded cross-border trading opportunities, only limited by available…

Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructurefiled 18 Nov 2021source

Access to an extensive, convenient and reliable fast-charging network is critical for large-scale electric vehicle (EV) adoption. That’s why, since opening our first Superchargers in 2012, we have been committed to rapid expansion of the network. Today, we have more than 30,000 Superchargers (high power chargers) worldwide.

Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructurefiled 4 May 2020source

General remarks Tesla welcomes the European Commission’s initiative to revise Directive 2014/94/EU on the deployment of alternative fuel infrastructure (AFID) in line with the objective to make the EU climate-neutral by 2050, for which rapid uptake of zero-emission vehicles is a key cornerstone.

Electrification Action Planfiled 9 Oct 2025source

Tesla is a world leader in battery storage and electric vehicles (EVs) manufacturing, including EV chargers. As a pioneering manufacturer of energy products and provider of grid flexibility services, including demand response, Tesla is driving the transition to sustainable abundance.

Shipments of wastefiled 8 Apr 2020PDFsource

Waste Shipment – Revision of EU rules Tesla input to the European Commission’s inception impact assessment General remarks: Tesla welcomes the European Commission’s intention to review the EU’s Waste Shipment Regulation (WSR) in light of the new Circular Economy Action Plan and the European Green Deal.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Revision of the EU’s energy security frameworkfiled 13 Oct 2025source

Tesla is a world leader in battery energy storage systems (battery storage), electric vehicles (EVs) and their charging infrastructure. As pioneering manufacturer of energy products and provider of grid flex services, including demand response, Tesla is driving the transition to sustainable abundance.

Revision of the Network Code on Requirements for Grid Connection of Generatorsfiled 25 Aug 2026PDFsource

Tesla supports the revision of the RfG. Europe would benefit from having a single set of grid connection rules for energy storage and for V2G. Harmonization is what makes mass-manufactured batteries and charging infrastructure affordable and scalable. It lowers cost for consumers and brings flexible, dispatchable capacity onto the grid when Europe needs it most. The Commission is pointing in the right direction.

Amending the Measuring Instruments Directivefiled 28 Feb 2025PDFsource

Tesla Europe strongly supports harmonization of requirements for recharging points under the Measuring Instruments Directive (MID). Currently, the lack of unified metering standards across the EU has resulted in inconsistent national laws and market fragmentation, undermining the single market.

Amending the Measuring Instruments Directivefiled 3 Oct 2024PDFsource

Tesla Europe supports and welcomes the idea of harmonized requirements for recharging points under MID, as long as the aim is to make national legislation redundant: the absence of harmonised requirements for metering solutions for recharging points leads to diverging national legislation and a fragmentation of the single market and shall therefore be converged with national legislations.

CO2 emission class of heavy-duty vehicles with trailersfiled 29 May 2023PDFsource

Trucks account for just 2.5% of the vehicles on EU roads, but are responsible for over one quarter of CO2 emissions from road transport. Moreover, heavy-duty road traffic is projected to increase by 44% by 2050.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Tesla next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 259.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Tesla’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.