Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
I am a professional in the laying sector and I would like the following points to be revised: The 100 % organic feed poses real problems in terms of performance and couts: Definition of a single 95 % organic feed obligation for all poultry (more than management of derogations) Delete the additional date period before the eggs have been placed on the market, after allopathic veterinary treatment, where the legal time…
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Hello, I share my views on the latest BIO regulation. With the move to 100 % BIO, we have an imbalance in protein intake, which leads to digestive problems for farm animals. The difficulty of finding availability of raw materials = > permanent changes in formulae which also affect the digestive comfort of the animals.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from TELLUS’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.