Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
TNH

Tænketanken Hav/Ocean Institute

Environmental organization · Denmark · EU Transparency Register 763570795861-35

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 126 think tanks and research institutions on this site, they rank #70 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.4
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2025
in the register since
Register category
Think tanks and research institutions
Head office
København K, Denmark

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Tænketanken in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Tænketanken Hav/Ocean Institute? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Tænketanken Hav/Ocean Institute engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Tænketanken Hav/Ocean Institute or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Tænketanken Hav/Ocean Institute filed 2 positions between 9 Feb 2026 and 9 Mar 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

What they argued

The European Ocean Actfiled 9 Feb 2026source

The European Ocean Act should function as a legally binding framework that consolidates fragmented marine governance across sectors, comparable to the role of the European Climate Act. Responsibilities for fisheries, maritime transport, infrastructure, energy, pollution, and environmental protection are currently dispersed across multiple legal instruments, weakening coherence, implementation, and enforcement.

Revision of EU rules to protect the marine environmentfiled 9 Mar 2026PDFsource

- MSFD is an ambitious instrument. However, its legal provisions, implementation, and enforcement do not sufficiently match its objective of achieving Good Environmental Status (GES) through an ecosystem-based approach. The Directive should therefore be strengthened. In particular, the legal possibilities to implement and enforce measures under the Directive should be enhanced.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 39.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Tænketanken Hav/Ocean Institute’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.