Strengthening public procurement for human rights and sustainability in the EU Public procurement in the EU accounts for 14% of GDP (2 trillion annually) and holds immense potential for fostering sustainable and ethical business practices. However, significant human rights and environmental risks persist in supply chains.
Swedwatch
NGO · Sweden · EU Transparency Register 441236726401-64
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #413 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- CONCORD Sweden
- International Working Group on Ethical Public Procurement (IWGEPP)
- OECD Watch
- ERIN
- The Business, Conflict and Human Rights Network
- Environment
- Climate
- Conflict and Peace (ECCP)
- Defend the Defenders Coalition
- European Coalition for Corporate Justice (ECCJ)
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Head office
- STOCKHOLM, Sweden
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Swedwatch in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Swedwatch? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Swedwatch filed 2 positions between 7 Mar 2025 and 23 Jan 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
The current Public Procurement Directives do not sufficiently equip contracting authorities to advance social and environmental objectives, prevent adverse social and environmental impacts, nor reward responsible businesses.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Cefic · 2 files in common
- EDF - Electricité de France · 2 files in common
- DIGITALEUROPE · 2 files in common
- Danish Chamber of Commerce · 2 files in common
- FEAD - European Waste Management Association · 2 files in common
Showing 5 of 128.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Swedwatch’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.