Svenskt Vatten supports the EurEau Reaction to the Call for Evidence Concerning the Evaluation of the SUPD The SUPD is an important tool to reduce plastic pollution and stimulate the circular economy. The results so far are partially positive but further strengthening is necessary.
SV
Svenskt Vatten
Industry association · Sweden · EU Transparency Register 993542340795-03
5
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
5
legislative files
of 665 tracked
4
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #675 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
3
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€400K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2020
in the register since
Declares membership of
- EurEau →
- https://www.eureau.org/
- Chemsec Business group
- https://chemsec.org/business-and-investors/chemsec-business-group/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Head office
- Bromma, Sweden
- EU office
- Bruxelles
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Svenskt in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Svenskt Vatten? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Svenskt Vatten filed 5 positions between 5 Nov 2021 and 7 Jul 2026, across 5 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
2021 · 1 filed2022 · 1 filed2023 · 1 filed2026 · 2 filed
What they argued
We welcome strict requirements in the EU’s CO2 emission performance standards, but we believe that EU legislation should be built around research-based well-to-wheel or life-cycle analysis on climate emissions. We are very critical of the persisting with the tailpipe approach, as proposed by the Commission.
Svenskt Vatten wishes to comment as follows: - The provisions of Article 192.2 (TFEU) must be respected. - The lack of harmonised test methods should not delay action, as there is ample evidence of microplastics in all environmental compartments. - The EU has so far failed to tackle MP at source. The legal acts, this initiative wants to link with, are ‘end-of-pipe’ directives (UWWTD, SSD, GWD, EQSD).
Svenskt Vattens most important messages ahead of the EU Parliament's and Councils continued work with the EU's wastewater directive Svenskt Vatten welcomes the revision of the Directive and the legislative proposal of the Commission.
Svenskt Vatten response to the European Commissions call for evidence on the upcoming Water Resilience R&I Strategy. Svenskt Vatten, Swedens national organisation for water and wastewater services, welcomes the proposed strategy. It addresses key challenges facing water utilities, including climate change, water scarcity, pollution and growing pressure on critical infrastructure.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Svenskt Vatten next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 47.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Svenskt Vatten’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.