Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
SPO

Spotify

Company · Sweden · EU Transparency Register 365747616583-15

2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #755 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

1.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€900K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since

Declares membership of

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Companies & groups
Head office
Stockholm, Sweden
EU office
Brussels

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Spotify in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Spotify

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Spotify? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Spotify filed 2 positions between 22 Nov 2017 and 24 Oct 2025, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2017 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed

What they argued

Digital Fairness Actfiled 24 Oct 2025PDFsource

Spotify was founded in Sweden by Daniel Ek in 2006, a time when the music industry was ravaged by piracy. We thought that if people could access the music they want, when they want, many would be willing to pay for it and we could help give artists the opportunity to live off their art. We share the European Commission's goal of ensuring high standards of consumer protection.

Online Intermediation Services Fairness and Transparency Regulationfiled 22 Nov 2017PDFsource

The European Commission’s Inception Impact Assessment on Fairness in platform-to-business relations Response of Spotify Spotify AB welcomes the opportunity to provide this response to the Commission’s Inception Impact Assessment on Fairness in platform-to-business relations (“IIA”).

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Spotify next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 16.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Spotify’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.