Please accept the attached feedback on the EU Commission's impact assessment for revisions to the Renewable Energy Directive (REDII) from the Southern Environmental Law Center. We support Option 4 of the assessment and further call for the exclusion of forest-derived biomass from the REDII.
Southern Environmental Law Center
NGO · United States · EU Transparency Register 157132415832-83
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1068 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #642 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Head office
- Charlottesville, United states
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Southern in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Southern Environmental Law Center? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Southern Environmental Law Center filed 2 positions between 6 Feb 2020 and 20 Sept 2020, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
This submission, on behalf of the Southern Environmental Law Center, focuses on the need to properly account for bioenergy emissions if the EU is to achieve its net-zero targets. EU climate policies, and the national policies/subsidies which stem from them, incorrectly categorize all bioenergy as carbon neutral at the point of combustion.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Southern Environmental Law Center next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 111.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Southern Environmental Law Center’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.