Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
SC

SMC Corporation

Company · Japan

3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track SMC in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at SMC Corporation? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files SMC Corporation engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 3 files, from SMC Corporation or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

SMC Corporation filed 3 positions between 2 Apr 2024 and 22 Sept 2025, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.

2024 · 2 filed2025 · 1 filed

What they argued

Carbon price paid in a third country under the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM)filed 22 Sept 2025source

As a large multinational corporation, we fully support the objectives of the European Green Deal and the EUs efforts to prevent carbon leakage. We recognize the importance of ambitious climate action and the need for a level playing field for European industry. However, we would like to highlight several significant challenges with the current implementation of the CBAM regulation: 1.

Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicalsfiled 2 Apr 2024source

Introduction Since our founding in 1959, SMC has grown as a comprehensive manufacturer of automatic control equipment. Our products are used in many different industries such as semiconductor, automotive, machine tools, food machinery and medical equipment to produce the many millions of products necessary for the modern world as it is today.

Evaluation of the Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) and the Simple Pressure Vessels Directive (SPVD)filed 19 Jun 2024source

It would seem to be logical to merge the PED & the SPVD so that manufacturers have a common standard for this type of equipment and the potential for misapplication is removed. In integrating the requirements care should be taken that the requirements for products formerly under each of the separated directives do not become more onerous for either category.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from SMC Corporation’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.