SGS welcomes the opportunity to comment on the call for feedback on Digital Product Passport (DPP) service providers related to the ESPR. Clear requirements should be set out to ensure a consistent approach for the delivery of the DPP. We support the introduction of a certification scheme with conformity assessment bodies (CAB) involved and delivered by Notified Bodies.
SGS
Company · Switzerland
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track SGS in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at SGS? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
SGS filed 2 positions between 27 Oct 2021 and 10 Dec 2024, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
Monitoring plays and will continue to play a crucial role in the mobility of tomorrow. It must evolve to take account of the following points: QUALIFICATION OF TECHNICAL CONTROLS Directive 2014/45 requires basic knowledge in certain disciplines, which in fact requires certain diplomas in maintenance of vehicles to be held.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- ACEA · 2 files in common
- TÜV-Verband e. V. · 2 files in common
- EGEA - European Garage Equipment Association · 2 files in common
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from SGS’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.