SAFE Food Advocacy Europe intervenes on Green Public Procurement: Based on 10 years of experience in sustainable consumption advocacy, we only respond to the aspects related to Green Public Procurement, which should: - Provide healthy diets free from NGTs/GMOs and ultra-processed foods, based on WHO dietary guidelines. - Include the calculation of food waste by type of dish.
SAFE Food Advocacy Europe
Consumer organization · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 104500414872-61
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #175 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- We are a member of EPHA, the European Public Health Alliance
- Website: https://epha.org
- We are participant and contributors to the EU Food Policy Coalition
- Website: https://foodpolicycoalition.eu/about-us/
- As Climate Pact ambassadors, we are members of the EUCliPa Italy group
- Website: https://www.euclipa.it/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Registered as
- SAFE (SAFE)
- Head office
- Ixelles, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track SAFE in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at SAFE Food Advocacy Europe? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
SAFE Food Advocacy Europe filed 9 positions between 21 Jun 2019 and 3 Sept 2026, across 7 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 7 times.
What they argued
As acknowledged by Eurostat in late 2022, in baseline year 2020, around 131 kilogrammes (kg) of food waste per inhabitant were generated in the EU, and this amount is likely to be underestimated . Therefore, at a time where food waste in the EU has reached records levels, SAFE welcomes the targeted revision of the Waste Framework Directive and the inclusion of new binding food waste reduction targets to be achieved…
Safe Food Advocacy Europe – SAFE welcomes the inclusion of the setting of food waste reduction targets in the objectives of the European Green Deal and the Farm to Fork Strategy, and the efforts shown by the European Commission to allow interested stakeholders to express their comments on the proposal to revise the Directive 2008/98/EC on waste.
SAFE really welcomes the Commission's initiative on the "Environmental performance of products & businesses". Nowadays, reducing humans' footprint on the environment is extremely important and it is one of the main priorities within the EU. Therefore, many companies tend to offer environmentally-friendly products and services.
This submission does not question the architecture of Regulation (EU) 2026/1388 or the treatment of category 2 NGT plants under the GMO legislation. It concerns what the justification permitting the arrangements for analytical methods to be adapted must contain, and how control laboratories obtain the means of applying those methods.
This submission does not question the architecture of Regulation (EU) 2026/1388 or the two-category classification. It concerns the consistency between an objective the legislator stated and the instruments the delegated act is to define.
Safe Food Advocacy Europe (SAFE) would like to express its view on the raising concern about hazardous food contact materials (FCMs) which are all the materials and articles that are intended to be put into contact with food, and beverages, or will presumably be in contact with food, or beverages.
Ecco la traduzione in inglese: In June 2024 and November 2026, SAFE Food Advocacy Europe delivered two scientific presentations to EFSAs Stakeholder Emerging Risks group on the risk of microplastic contamination in soils.
SAFE thanks the Commission for allowing citizens and interested stakeholders to provide a feedback on the migration limits for lead, cadmium and other materials from ceramic and vitreous food contact materials. We take this opportunity to provide the Commission with inputs on the issues which need to be covered during the impact assessment and we would like to point out some elements that are worthy of concern.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put SAFE Food Advocacy Europe next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 133.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from SAFE Food Advocacy Europe’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.