Company · Netherlands · EU Transparency Register 793750635630-82
2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #484 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Register category
Companies & groups
Head office
Schiphol, Netherlands
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at Royal Schiphol Group? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Royal Schiphol Group filed 2 positions between 10 Jun 2025 and 5 Nov 2025, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
Response Royal Schiphol Group call for evidence Circular Economy Act November 5th, 2025 Introduction Royal Schiphol Group (Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Rotterdam The Hague Airport, Eindhoven Airport, Maastricht Aachen Airport and Lelystad Airport) welcomes the European Commission plans for a Circular Economy Act. We emphasize the need to create a circular society and aim to be a fully circular airport by 2050.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Royal Schiphol Group (RSG) welcomes the European Commission call for evidence for an impact assessment of Regulation 1008/2008. Schiphol is among Europes major hubs, providing direct connectivity to over 300 destinations worldwide. Our extensive route network is of great importance for access to the EU and the Netherlands. Many of these destinations would not be sustainable if there was no hubbing at Schiphol.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Royal Schiphol Group’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.
