Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
RIJ

Rijksvastgoedbedrijf

Public authority · Netherlands

not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.

2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Rijksvastgoedbedrijf in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Rijksvastgoedbedrijf

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Rijksvastgoedbedrijf? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Rijksvastgoedbedrijf filed 2 positions between 6 Mar 2025 and 9 Jan 2026, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Evaluation of the Public Procurement Directivesfiled 6 Mar 2025PDFsource

The central real estate company is the largest real estate owner in the Netherlands. As the purchase volume of the Rijkreal estate company increases by between 50 % and 100 %, simplification and flexibility of procurement processes is needed.

Filed in Dutch · English published by the European Commission

European Open Digital Ecosystemsfiled 9 Jan 2026PDFsource

# In response to Question 1 (barriers to adoption and contribution): ## Using Open Source A major practical barrier: we cannot buy infrastructure "just in case", so there is nowhere to run FOSS without lengthy procurement. A lot of open source registered in government OSPOs (when they exist at all) is actually packaged in commercial products, which solves the practical problems but defeats the purpose.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Rijksvastgoedbedrijf next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 14.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Rijksvastgoedbedrijf’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.