Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
RCP

Responsible Contracting Project

NGO · United States · EU Transparency Register 890530196667-05

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #397 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.6
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2025
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • American Bar Association
  • Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
Newark, NJ, United states

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Responsible in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Responsible Contracting Project? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Responsible Contracting Project engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Responsible Contracting Project or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Responsible Contracting Project filed 2 positions between 7 Mar 2025 and 26 Jan 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Evaluation of the Public Procurement Directivesfiled 7 Mar 2025PDFsource

The EU Public Procurement Directives should provide clear direction for public buyers who wish to set Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence (HREDD) criteria for commercial suppliers. Public buyers should also be provided with clear guidance and flexibility to conduct HREDD, enabling them to screen suppliers, set conditions of participation, and assess their capacity to uphold human rights and environmental…

Revision of EU rules on public procurementfiled 26 Jan 2026PDFsource

The Responsible Contracting Project (RCP) welcomes the revision of the EU Public Procurement Directive. This submission sets out a short, targeted set of recommendations to improve legal clarity and operational effectiveness in the Directive, with a specific focus on equipping public buyers to use contracts as a key mechanism for supporting proportionate, risk-based human rights and environmental due diligence…

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 128.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Responsible Contracting Project’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.