Industry association · Slovakia · EU Transparency Register 253757237449-25
7
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
7
legislative files
of 665 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #506 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€100K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2020
in the register since
Declares membership of
BusinessEurope https://www.businesseurope.eu/
BIAC/OECD http://biac.org/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
Register category
Trade and business associations
Head office
Bratislava, Slovakia
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at Republiková únia zamestnávateľov? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Republiková únia zamestnávateľov filed 7 positions between 30 Mar 2020 and 8 Jun 2026, across 7 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
Republiková únia zamestnávateľov, Digital Park III, Einsteinova 19, 851 01 Bratislava 5 tel.: [phone removed], [email removed], www.zamestnavatelia.sk Position of RUZ on REVISION OF EU RULES ON PUBLIC PROCUREMENT Position on the evaluation of the Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal…
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
CARBON BORDER ADJUSTEMENT It is essential that a carbon border adjustment is implemented as a complementary measure in addition to existing carbon leakage provisions in the transition towards climate neutrality. This measure should be applied, in the form of the customs on the imported products. We strongly oppose any other form of tax, fee or any other financial burden levied on the domestic EU production.
We propose that, as part of finalising the implementing regulation, the Commission should include a methodological verification of the representativeness of the 20212022 reference period used for updating the heat and fuel benchmarks for the 20262030 period.
We don’t agree with extension of emissions trading to emissions from building and road transport or all fossil fuels combustion. Addition building and road transport sectors to the emission trading would have little additional impact on emissions from these sectors, but would significantly increase living costs for poorer households.
ENERGY TAXATION DIRECTIVE Inception impact assessment The following elements should be taken into account by the Commission (extended version of our statement is provided in the attached document): Keep current exemptions: to keep the possibility of exempted or reduced level energy consumption taxation for those energy‐intensive businesses competing globally.
Attached document is the contribution of Republiková únia zamestnávateľov (tripartite social partner representing wide spectrum of business associations and companies of Slovakia) to the consultation on amendments to the EU taxonomy Climate Delegated Act (EU) 2021/2139.
The proposed implementing regulation pursues the legitimate objective of improving the quality, consistency and comparability of data on beneficial owners (BOs) in central registers across the EU. This objective is broadly consistent with Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 and with the general interest in effectively combating money laundering.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Republiková únia zamestnávateľov next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Republiková únia zamestnávateľov’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.
