Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
RU

Region Uppsala

Public authority · Sweden

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Region in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Region Uppsala? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Region Uppsala engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Region Uppsala or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Region Uppsala filed 2 positions between 7 Feb 2025 and 3 Oct 2025, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.

What they argued

Evaluation of the Public Procurement Directivesfiled 7 Feb 2025source

(1) abolish the prohibition on the evaluation of suppliers. The fact that only tenders may be evaluated is based on the idea that suppliers are either acceptable or not. Reality is different: A supplier may have such shortcomings that the contracting authority is willing to avoid a contractual relationship, but may still imagine it if there is no budgetary or other alternative.

Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission

Simplifying and reducing the burden of the rules on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices, and support of the European Medicines Agency for the expert panels on medical devices and the list of Union harmonisation legislationfiled 3 Oct 2025source

We think that: — lifespan, MDR and reprocessing need to be reviewed: the regulatory framework should support reprocessing to a greater extent, outside the lifetime period. It also promotes sustainability and environmental objectives, in addition to its positive economic effects. — it should not be a special adaptation when assembling spectacle frames with personalised lenses for visual correction.

Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 15.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Region Uppsala’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.