NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 968884434332-54not in register snapshot
This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 14 Sept 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.
2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Work at R.I.S.K. Consultancy? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
R.I.S.K. Consultancy filed 2 positions between 11 Dec 2023 and 25 Jan 2024, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
Thank you for considering this public comment. 'Sec. 2. Legal Basis, Subsidiarity' express the core purposes of this Proposed Regulation [my emphasis]: “...The aim of providing a high level of protection of human health and the environment and of contributing to coherent safety assessments… The ultimate objective regarding information availability and information sharing is to collate all data on chemicals centrally…
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Concerning the Commission's ambition of: "establishing a common, open data platform on chemicals and tools for accessing relevant academic data." ...perhaps you could also propose that the data produced by academia be evaluated across all the legislation that you will be modifying (that which requires evaluation of the safety of petrochemicals (which includes medicines).
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put R.I.S.K. Consultancy next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from R.I.S.K. Consultancy’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.