Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
PPS

PSCE - Public Safety Communication Europe Forum

NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 020457430494-14

3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #257 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

3.8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2018
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • ETSI: https://www.etsi.org/membership/members
  • 6GIA: https://6g-ia.eu/members/

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Registered as
Public Safety Communication Europe (PSCE)
Head office
Brussels, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track PSCE in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at PSCE - Public Safety Communication Europe Forum? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files PSCE - Public Safety Communication Europe Forum engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 3 files, from PSCE - Public Safety Communication Europe Forum or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

PSCE - Public Safety Communication Europe Forum filed 3 positions between 19 Jun 2024 and 10 Jul 2025, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

2024 · 1 filed2025 · 2 filed

What they argued

Digital Networks Actfiled 10 Jul 2025source

PSCE fully supports the initiative to develop the Digital Networks Act. We particularly welcome the consideration to include more than only the economic considerations which have been the focus of the innovation drive for mobile communication until recently.

How to master Europe’s digital infrastructure needs?filed 19 Jun 2024PDFsource

Our feedback primarily focuses on EUCCS (section 2.4.2), but comments are made for topics throughout the paper where and in the attachment. Without EUCCS: - Europe continues to rely on 25-30 year old mobile communication technology for safety and security practitioners.

European Critical Communication Systemfiled 23 May 2025source

PSCE fully supports the establishment of EUCCS. European responders are today using 20-25 year old technology which can only be used within member states in most cases. This limits civil protection and police cooperation across Europe and only allows for voice and short text communication.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 107.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from PSCE - Public Safety Communication Europe Forum’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.