not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
5
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
5
legislative files
of 665 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Work at Provincie Utrecht? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Provincie Utrecht filed 5 positions between 14 Jan 2021 and 31 Mar 2026, across 5 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
You can read the English version below. Geachte Europese Commissie, De regio Utrecht, door de Europese Commissie bestempeld als “meest competitieve regio van Europa” en door de Europese Commissie aangewezen als Regional Innovation Valley op het gebied van gezondheidsinnovatie, beschikt over een unieke combinatie van hoogwaardige kennisinstellingen, (academische) ziekenhuizen en onderzoekscentra, zoals het…
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
The Utrecht region values and supports the European Commissions focus on innovation. Recognized by the European Commission as the most competitive region in Europe, Utrecht places great importance on a strong and successful Innovation Act for our region. Please, find our feedback in the attached file.
— We welcome the European Commission’s wish to clarify short-term rentals, in particular for local authorities, private parties and consumers. — We support the Committee’s overall commitment to enabling a greater supply of social and affordable housing by encouraging the development of new housing units and better use of existing buildings.
Filed in Dutch · English published by the European Commission
The Commission states that it is unlikely that an implementation plan is needed as the Ambient Air Quality Directive already is in force, and that the implementation structures are already in place within the Members States with the competent authorities appropriately designated. We would like to state that, besides impact assessments, in our opinion an implementation plan is in fact very important.
The present Rail Infrastructure Capacity Regulation does not sufficiently take into account the impact that intensive use of rail can have on the surrounding environment, in particular because of the transport of (dangerous) goods.
Filed in Dutch · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Provincie Utrecht next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Provincie Utrecht’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.
