Industry association · France · EU Transparency Register 492995915482-04
4
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #838 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€25K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since
Declares membership of
Au niveau national Phyteis est membre de France chimie (anciennement UIC : Union de l'Industrie Chimique). Par ailleu…
Phyteis parraine l'association française des biotechnologies végétales (AFBV).
Au niveau européen, Phyteis est membre de CropLife Europe (ex ECPA (European Crop Protection Association))
Au niveau international, Phyteis est en lien avec CropLife International
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
Register category
Trade and business associations
Registered as
Phyteis (ex Union de l'Industrie de la Protection des Plantes) (Phyteis)
Head office
Boulogne, France
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Biotechnology is a strategic asset for European competitiveness and food security. The Biotech Act I was a missed opportunity, as its limited scope did not address regulatory barriers to biotechnology in agriculture. The Biotech Act II should include the topic of plant biotechnologies, including simplification of GMO authorisation procedures, without compromising health and environmental safety.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Contribution by Phyteis (French professional organisation of the plant protection industry, in its diversity)/Transparency Register (Union8813981475). Yes to a proposal on NGTs that promotes innovation for a resilient and economically viable agriculture. Agriculture faces unprecedented challenges.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Category 2 NGTs The success of the NGT Regulation depends on the operational arrangements that will be implemented. According to the EFSA opinion of 11/07/2024, NGT cat 2 plants do not, by nature, pose higher risks than cat 1 plants or even conventionally bred plants. In this respect, and in the light of recital 37, their assessment requires a flexible approach, on a case-by-case basis and proportionate to the risk.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Phyteis’ contribution to the public consultation on the executive acts relating to category 1 NGT plants. The success of the new framework (EU) 2026/1388 applicable to the plants defined in cat1 will depend on the executive acts which must be clear, proportionate, favourable to innovation and guarantee uniform implementation between the various Member States, without any restrictions or requirements additional to…
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Phyteis next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Phyteis’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.