Palo Alto Networks appreciates the opportunity to provide input on the European Commission's White paper How to Master Europes Digital Infrastructure Needs. As the leading global provider of cybersecurity solutions, we understand the importance of fostering a competitive and secure digital environment.
Palo Alto Networks
Company · United States · EU Transparency Register 263314723145-29
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #469 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Information Technology Industry Council (ITI), https://www.itic.org/
- TechUK, https://www.techuk.org/
- Digital Europe, https://www.digitaleurope.org/
- Bitkom
- Germany
- https://www.bitkom.org/
- Business Software Association (BSA), www.bsa.org
- European Internet Forum, https://www.internetforum.eu/
- AmChamEU, https://www.amchameu.eu/
- Allianz für Cyber-Sicherheit, https://www.bsi.bund.de/DE/Themen/Unternehmen-und-Organisationen/Informationen-und-Empf…
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Registered as
- Palo Alto Networks Inc.
- Head office
- Santa Clara, United states
- EU office
- Amsterdam
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Palo in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Palo Alto Networks? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Palo Alto Networks filed 2 positions between 26 Jun 2024 and 17 Dec 2025, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
Palo Alto Networks currently plays a vital role in securing critical European assets and infrastructure. In our view, any policy of "European preference" must be carefully and narrowly applied to avoid negative, unintended consequences that could undermine the very security objectives they aim to achieve. Introducing a mandatory "European preference" across the board risks: 1.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Palo Alto Networks’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.