Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
ORG

Organisation

Company · Germany

identity not settledMore than one register entry could match this filer, so we have not linked it to any of them. The filings shown are those under this exact name.

3
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Organisation in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Organisation

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Organisation? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Organisation filed 3 positions between 21 Jul 2025 and 10 Mar 2026, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 2 filed

What they argued

Single-use plastics and fishing gear rules - evaluationfiled 10 Mar 2026source

As a citizen who is important for the environment and climate, I strongly support the objectives of the EU Single-Use Plastics Directive. At the same time, I consider it important to look closely at implementation and not to treat different materials in the same way across the board. In my view, this also includes cellulose acetate.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Single-use plastics and fishing gear rules - evaluationfiled 10 Mar 2026source

As a citizen who is important for the environment and climate, I strongly support the objectives of the EU Single-Use Plastics Directive. At the same time, I consider it important to look closely at implementation and not to treat different materials in the same way across the board. In my view, this also includes cellulose acetate.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

European standardisationfiled 21 Jul 2025source

As I understand it, European standardisation should include stakeholder participation. I was made aware of a controversy around EN 303 798 V2.0.1 in the national body. Normally ETSI publishes great work, but this EN was different. I was told that the controversy was because the norm contradicted an earlier European standardisation mandate that requires compatibility.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Organisation next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Organisation’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.