Oil Change International appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on the EUs Arctic strategy, of which we have the following recommendations: The EU must uphold its commitment to an Arctic hydrocarbon moratorium and establish a clear timeline to phase out oil and gas from the Barents Sea, which is north of the Arctic Circle in Norway.
OCI
Oil Change International
NGO · Norway · EU Transparency Register 122131796534-20
2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #386 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.6
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
—
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2025
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Oil Change International is a member of:
- Climate Action Network International https://climatenetwork.org/
- Global Gas and Oil Network https://ggon.org/
- Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice https://demandclimatejustice.org/
- Beyond Gas Network https://www.rosalux.eu/metanavigation/multimedia/time-to-go-beyond-gas/
- Kick Big Polluters Out coalition https://kickbigpollutersout.org/
- Real Zero Europe https://www.realzeroeurope.org/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Head office
- Washington DC, United states
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Oil in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Oil Change International? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Oil Change International filed 2 positions between 10 Sept 2025 and 2 Mar 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is extremely expensive, cannot actually capture sufficient emissions or store them safely, and will expose local communities and nature to risk across Europe if a CO2 transport network is built.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Bellona Europa · 2 files in common
- Seas At Risk · 2 files in common
- Equinor ASA · 2 files in common
- IOGP Europe · 2 files in common
- NOAH Friends of the Earth Denmark · 2 files in common
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Oil Change International’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.