I am submitting this feedback on behalf of the North Donegal Fishermen's Group, which represents small-scale inshore fishermen operating along Ireland's north-west coast. The proposed simplification of the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF) and the transposition of the WTO Agreement present an opportunity to strengthen support for sustainable coastal communities and Europe's seafood sector.
North Donegal Fishermen's Group
NGO · Ireland
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track North in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at North Donegal Fishermen's Group? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
North Donegal Fishermen's Group filed 2 positions on 15 Jul 2026, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
For the EMFAF consultation, I would avoid framing the submission around fisheries compensation or sector-specific grievances. The strongest approach is to connect fisheries funding with Europe's wider objectives for food security, coastal resilience and sustainable ocean governance.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put North Donegal Fishermen's Group next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 9.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from North Donegal Fishermen's Group’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.