Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 334674912578-83
9
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
7
legislative files
of 665 tracked
9
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #464 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€400K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
2
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2014
in the register since
Register category
Trade and business associations
Head office
Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at Methanol Institute? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Methanol Institute filed 9 positions between 24 Apr 2020 and 26 Jan 2026, across 7 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 9 times.
Position paper On Amending Directive (EU) 2018/2001 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and, as a consequence, Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action and Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels AND Delegated regulation on GHG accounting of renewable electricity for the production of Renewable Fuels of Non-Biological…
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
The Methanol Institute endorses the Commission’s proposal for the revision of the Energy Taxation Directive (ETD). Restructuring taxation to be based on energy content and consumption, represents an effective method to decrease the relative tax burden for low carbon and net carbon neutral fuels.
The Methanol Institute agrees with the European Commission's assessment that in order to achieve the European Green Deal's objective of climate neutrality in the EU by 2050, significant policy action must be undertaken in the passenger vehicle segment.
Feedback on CO2 emissions for cars and vans – revision of performance standards 26 November 2020 Dear Executive Vice-President Timmermans, Dear Commissioner Vălean, Dear Commissioner Simson, The Methanol Institute (MI) firmly supports the climate action plan of the European Union and its objective to become climate neutral by 2050.
The Methanol Institute welcomes the opportunity submit feedback concerning the Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Regulation. We support the spirit of the regulation, but suggest it be refined to reflect the plurality of solutions capable of delivering the necessary climate benefits to attain the Union's climate ambition.
The Methanol Institute (MI) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the Delegated Directive amending Annex V and Annex VI to Directive (EU) 2018/2001 as regards rules for calculating the greenhouse gas impact of biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels and their fossil fuel comparators.
We strongly endorse the adoption of a Well-to-Wake accounting approach to measure maritime emissions under the FuelEU Maritime initiative, as it gives a complete picture of the environmental profile of fuels and avoids a shift of emissions to upstream production processes.
The Methanol Institute would like to thank the European Commission for the opportunity to comments on the Inception Impact Assessment (IIA) of the Fuel EU Maritime initiative. The Methanol Institute serves as the trade association for the global methanol industry and exists to promote Methanol as a marine fuel.
The Methanol Institute (MI) is the global trade association for the entire supply chain of the methanol industry, representing the worlds leading methanol producers, consumers, distributors, and technology companies. MI represents its members from offices in Singapore, Washington D.C., Brussels, Beijing, and Delhi.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Methanol Institute next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Methanol Institute’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.